Wednesday, January 2, 2013

THE END OR A NEW BEGINNING:THE VIRTUAL WORLD

What is reality? I do not want to get into any philosophical or existential discussion about the nature of reality. As you all know a large percentage of the youth in this country and world are now addicts to the virtual world and more specifically the social networks. At some point I thought well this is going to be the end of our social lives as human beings. I remember one day we were supposed to be hanging out in campus but at some point everyone had their phone in their hands, Facebook, twitter you name it. I remember thinking to myself if we are like this and we got our phones mostly after high school, what is going to happen the future generation.
Kids now get internet browsing phones when as young as nine years. Are these boys going to know how to talk to a girl outside Facebook? Will they be able to take them out on a coffee date, will they even know the common courtesies involved in dating and well…in everyday life? There’s a fear that kids are learning more than they should be for their ages thanks to the internet age. This fear is justified because with the internet comes with unmonitored freedom, while it’s a good free source of knowledge, the internet has no guardian to keep the pedos and the child molesters out, with the typing of a link a kid can access all the pornography in this line. This verse from my favorite rapper Lupe Fiasco captures this dilemma beautifully. “Now imagine a group of little girls nine through twelve, on the internet watching videos listenin’ to songs by themselves, it doesn’t really matter if they have parental clearance, they understand the internet better than they parents.”
 I have come to change my view and not simply because I can now consider myself also hooked to the virtual world. I tried to stay for a week without technology but I only lasted two hours. Today I was watching an anime (Japanese cartoon for the anti geeks) called Serial experiments Lain. It’s basically about how thin the line between reality and the virtual world really is. The anime pushes this further by suggesting that in fact there might be no difference between the real world and the virtual one. The two worlds get blurred and interchangeable with devastating consequences. Luckily we have not reached there but who knows with this ever growing technology what tomorrow has in store for us. Today I and the rest of the frequent visitors of social networks have more virtual friends than they do in ‘real life’. But I’m I justified to even draw this distinction? What is reality anyway? Is it not simply whatever our brains can conjure and convince us that that is how the world is? When we are having a nightmare and we wake up, palpitating and sweating profusely, for all intents and purposes was the dream not real enough to us? When we get absorbed in a good book, when we cry when we watch a sad scene in a movie, is this less real than everything else we experience in our day to day lives? 


I was previously arguing that with the social networks comes the beginning of the end of social lives but my position is actually the opposite now. With the coming of all this technology and social networks then we are simply ushering in a new reality. The same way some people have argued that the end of the Christian world and the second coming as simply the mark of the coming of the new age of Pisces but that is a story for another day. More than ninety percent of my friends now come from interactions in the virtual world. Like the cartoon I was watching today it is becoming harder and harder to draw the line between the real and the virtual world. And just like in the cartoon my real world and the virtual world are starting to increasingly merge. Lovers, friends, enemies have been forged in this virtual world, others developing into real life friends others remaining in the interwebz. Some people could argue that it’s healthier to have more real life friends but this argument has not legs to stand on, real life friendships also go through the same phases virtual ones do, they too are not everlasting or perfect. And what are people? Aren’t they just the sum total of what they communicate to us and what we interpret about them? Bodies are nothing more than machines that allow for this interface, computers can now provide all that is required to interface with each other. We do not require physical bodies to communicate with each other, we can still make each other laugh, cry and even angry well from behind our keyboards, while the anonymity has brought with it’s a certain stain of callousness and the dark side of people, it has also allowed us to explore different personalities, to create how we want to appear and what we wish to communicate to the different faceless virtual interfaces we interact with on these social networks.
So while some people argue that social networks are the death of our social lives, we can tell them this is simply the birth of a new reality, a new world , more flexible, more exciting and easier to construct without all the burdens that arise in the real world. So a toast to the new matrix in which we are all pioneers of, we are free to shape it however we want it, the limit only lie with our imagination and creativity. With the every end comes a new beginning after all.

14 comments:

  1. Seriously? Reality is a state of mind? I think that's bullshit. Reality is reality. I don't understand this article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wow...me thinks you need help understanding this article

      Delete
    2. A table is a table. But is that a nourishing description to open up any sort of understanding of what a table is? A broader definition incorporating the one organ which defines, perceives and acts on the perceptions of what it brings about to be reality is in order, hence. Why is reality spoken of to be "a state of mind"? Because the mind is the only thing that can appreciate its existence and attempt to describe it. Without the mind, is there any description, appreciation, concept or experience of reality? When we jump into transhumanism and incorporate machines more and more into our lives such that we become inseparable with them, does it not give us a different experience of reality, but one which is still real nonetheless? I am yet to meet a lot of the people I know, yet our interactions on the virtual world are very real. The context within which "reality is a state of mind" matters. As for Serial Experiments: Laine, there is a lot more to be phished from that and I suspect Nelson will keep digging for more gems on it.

      Delete
    3. True Ojay, nothing to be added there, on serial experiments lain, covering all the themes expressed therein will require more than a few words :)

      Delete
  2. Could not agree more , we humans tend to sharpen our differences and blur our common ground, likewise is the boarder between virtual and reality not sharp at all, wondering if one can even speak of a border . Another human fallacy is the fear of new technology or we fear the technology itself, like farmers feared in 1830 the train passing their fields , thinking the cows would not produce milk anymore , or we fear the replacement like when movies where produced people predicted the end of books , or television news was to replace the newspapers , of course neither of those things happened, so virtual friendship will not replace '' the real thing '' it will only open new possibility's and opportunity's taking away the limits of distance, culture, race, tribe, background, wealth and so on , a brave new world but not according to the predictions of Aldous Huxley .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, I wonder though is fear to new technology and anything new something inherent in human beings? Is it some sort of coping mechanism to the anxiety provoked by uncertainty? All great paradigm shifts or zeitgeists for instance have always been marked by negative reaction and sometimes violence..the age of enlightenment comes to mind. Could this be the dawn of yet a new shift in out consciousness as a species?

      Delete
  3. I agree with you in many respects except the part on pornography and children. It is projecting our ideas on children that makes us think they will browse those adult sites. I have been living with my sister for the holiday season and she has access to the internet the whole day but I can tell you she hasn't bothered with any adult site. You could argue that is a small sample size, but you could try it and you'll be shocked at what you'll find.
    Am worried about pedos and a way has to be found to deal with them so as to ensure children are safe while on the world wide web.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are a lot of studies that have been done on pornography in connection to children and the internet. The findings are that with internet and internet enabled phones it is a fact that more kids have access to pornography than they ever could before the access to the internet and internet enabled phones...

      Delete
  4. Reality is mostly defined by our interpretation and reaction to situations. Most of the time we are reacting to our perceptions based on knowledge, personal and communal experience, beliefs, logic thoughts and intuitions. The laws of science are the ultimate test for reality. The human experience is to equate emotional response to reality. The sensations are real, such as waking up from a bad dream in broken sweat, but it is mostly an automatic response to the innate sensation of fear. Virtual relationships are as real as physical ones, maybe even more so.I met my wife on facebook but we connected over coffee at Kengeles. People tend to pretend a lot. Social media and technology have given an efficient channel for communicating both pretence and truth. Just as language did...a human invention. It is very telling that we are using images more than ever before to communicate. Never before have so many images been taken and shared. Whether in Jest or providing evidence, reality is getting more accurate. A picture they say is worth a thousand words.The default human reaction to anything new is usually fear. It takes intellectual effort to discern and see opportunity. That is the ability to evolve to a new reality. It is a more silent one in words but a loud one in reach. To me the real casualty is the mass media. I do not need to know that there was a bomb in Bombay. But I do want to know that my friends in Bombay are fine. They tell me and I know what they had for breakfast.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Amadi, except a question, can reality ever be separated from let's say emotional responses or human experiences? Is it not something that is all tied together? Well perhaps we should define what we would be implying what we mean by the word for example in the case of the dream. I also agree with your point on the mass media, I do not watch Tv anymore yet I am always on the know about what is happening here and else where and mostly in real time too. I think the communication networks have allowed us to be more connected that we have ever been before...

      Delete
  5. I agree as well and little is left to say after the insight offered in the article and the comments above. I do have a thing or two to say about reality as well as the current evolution of virtual presence. Anyone who believes they have a grasp on reality is furthest from it. There are as many possible versions of reality as there are minds that can perceive any phenomena. To believe that ones perception of the world is dependable is to know nothing of how the human mind works. Much of what we think we experience is manufactured by the mind which is adept at filling in its one details beyond what our senses are capable of to give us just enough bearing to survive. Even the idea that science is a window into reality is one I am yet to buy. Science is a window to human experience; nothing more than a means by which we communicate with the universe through a tiny hole in the wall we call the human mind. The virtual world is not something that will happen some time in the future, it is where we have been all along. Whether we communicate through organic machines or silicon based machines, neither brings us closer to nor takes us further from reality. Reality is a sensory illusion created by the brains ability to record and compare change and as such, reality is subject to the view point... even science. Science is not reality. It is simply a heightened ability for the human mind to manipulate its own experience of movement and time within its own boundaries set by senses that have selectively evolved to only capture and record what a human being needs to survive in earth-like conditions. That said I do not believe that computers and the internet can replace human interaction just yet. They are still very primitive tools of communication compared to the human body. To start with we have a mind that we cannot even trust to accurately discern phenomena in its own environment and we add a limited digital prosthetic to compound the problem. I will welcome a social network when we finally invent one, for now, all we have are advanced communication networks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your input Kim, I agree with, that's an interesting perspective because I have always thought of science as the epitome of what reality is but recently that view has to come to reluctantly change as well. I think if more people understand that science is simply a more precise extension of out senses and human experiences then they will learn that they need not fear what new things and experiences it has to offer us...

      Delete
  6. The social world is an extension of our social lives. There is little difference between interacting with you face-to-face and virtual interactions. The only difference is medium and new restraints on the freedom of expressing our needs. It is not about replacing, it is about pursuing new frontiers to fulfill our needs. Of course, every new medium has its negative consequences but the positives far outweigh these drawbacks. As for reality, I've always held that the core and principal function of the mind is imagination. Imagination is the source of all reality. All is real. The only difference is whether its an imagined one or experienced one (with regard to perception). What we call today 'virtual reality' will be the 'reality of our grandchildren'... there will be nothing virtual about it. Can computers replace human interaction? No, they enhance human interaction. It is us who utilize these mediums/technologies for our own interactive needs. If I switch off my PC, will it chat with Nelson? Not really. We have to engage for our interactive needs to be satisfied.

    ReplyDelete